The Crossroads Study
Judges, Probation Officers, and District
Attorneys are tasked with evaluating cases of suspected juvenile
offending and determining which youth to channel into the justice
system and which to divert from formal processing. How do they
make this decision? How should they make this decision? In
spite of the widely varying costs of different justice system outcomes,
there is very little research examining the factors that juvenile
justice professionals consider when making these determinations. There
is even less empirical research aimed at informing these decisions and
those of other justice system arbiters in order to maximize benefits
and limit long term costs to society. As a result, juvenile case
processing is characterized by inconsistency, even within a single
state. The goal of the proposed study is to create an empirical
foundation for developing decision-making guidelines for juvenile
justice professionals that serve the best interest of the community,
the taxpayers, and delinquent youths.